Back

Underhydration is prevalent across education levels and associated with low intake of water but not sugar-sweetened beverages: A cross-sectional study from the UK

Claassen, M. A.; Papies, E. K.

2026-01-30 nutrition
10.64898/2026.01.28.26344904 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAdequate hydration is vital for health, yet many people do not meet fluid recommendations. This study aimed to characterise the role of water and sugar-sweetened beverages in hydration across different levels of socioeconomic status (SES) in the UK. MethodsIn a pre-registered cross-sectional study, participants (N = 1,112) recalled beverages consumed on the previous day and reported urine colour as an indicator of their hydration status. We analysed water intake (H1), sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake (H2), and SES (education; H3) as predictors of hydration status using stepwise binomial logistic regression adjusted for health, demographic, and lifestyle covariates. ResultsForty percent of participants were classified as underhydrated. Higher water intake was associated with a greater likelihood of adequate hydration: Drinking one extra glass of water per day (250 ml) increased the odds of being adequately hydrated by about 16%. However, SSB intake was not associated with hydration unless intake from other drink sources was held constant. Having a higher versus lower level of education was not significantly associated with hydration status, although finer-grained and income-based analyses suggested modest socioeconomic differences. ConclusionWater intake--rather than SSB intake--is the primary correlate of adequate hydration in this UK sample. Public health initiatives should emphasise the importance of water for hydration, invest in ways to make water more appealing, and promote the use of urine colour as a marker of hydration status.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
19
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%