Back

The association of osteoarthritis with the risk of de novo inflammatory arthritis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study

Chen, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Thanarajasingam, U.; Crowson, C. S.; Zeng, H.

2026-01-30 rheumatology
10.64898/2026.01.28.26344880 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIdentifying risk factors enables stratification of patients susceptibility to inflammatory arthritis immune-related adverse events (IA-irAE). This retrospective study examines whether preexisting osteoarthritis (OA) increases the likelihood of de novo IA in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MethodsThe prevalence of OA among ICI-treated patients who developed IA-irAE, those who developed other types of irAEs but not IA (non-IA irAE), and those who did not develop any irAEs (non-irAE) were compared. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results181 de novo IA-irAE patients, 140 non-IA irAE patients and 170 non-irAE patients were included. The prevalence of OA was significantly higher in the IA-irAE group (69%) than the non-IA irAE group (48%) and the non-irAE group (48%) (both p < 0.001). The IA-irAE group demonstrated a higher frequency of multisite OA, with predominant hand involvement (62%) than the non-IA irAE with OA group (13%) and the non-irAE with OA group (13%) (both p < 0.001). A family history of autoimmune disease (AID) (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.02-4.05), preexisting OA (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.85-4.52) and melanoma (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56-4.47) were identified as risk factors for the development of IA-irAE. ConclusionsOA was more prevalent among ICI-treated patients developing IA-irAE than those who did not. Hand OA was the most common OA pattern in IA-irAE patients. Preexisting OA, melanoma and a family history of AID were risk factors for IA-irAE.

Published in Arthritis Care &amp; Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.