Back

Selection shapes the evolution of genome size in a globally invasive plant

Nongthongbam, B.; Battlay, P.; Maunder, K. G.; Fournier-Level, A.; Martin, M. D.; Stinchcombe, J. R.; Hodgins, K. A.

2026-01-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.27.702167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIBiological invasions provide powerful natural experiments for understanding how genome architecture responds to novel climatic environments. Transposable elements (TEs) can rapidly restructure genomes, yet their role in adaptive genome size evolution during invasion remains poorly understood. C_LIO_LIHere, we examined genome size and TE abundance in 440 individuals of the globally invasive common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) across native (North American) and invasive (European, Australian) ranges. By integrating whole-genome resequencing, flow cytometry, and PST-FST comparisons, we tested whether genome size evolution is shaped by selection, climate, and life-history traits. C_LIO_LIGenome size was significantly larger in Australian populations, driven by increased TE and rRNA (ribosomal RNA) abundance. Crucially, PST-FST analyses revealed divergent selection on genome size in North American and European populations, but not in Australia. Furthermore, genome size correlated with mean annual temperature (MAT), in North America, linking genomic traits to environmental variables, while its effect on flowering time was significant but weak and largely overlapping with the polygenic background. C_LIO_LIGenome size evolution during invasion can be rapid, adaptive, and range-specific. TE-driven genome expansion challenges the assumption of a genome size reduction during invasion, demonstrating that selection and environmental context shape genome architecture during range expansion. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.