Back

Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern

Wills, J. W.; White, A.; Harte, D. S. G.; Buckley, R.; Harvey, J. S.; Lynch, A. M.

2026-01-28 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.01.27.702058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The management of N-nitrosamine impurities challenges pharmaceutical development and regulation worldwide. Because most medicinal exposures are shorter than lifetime and absolute impurity exclusion is impossible, reliable approaches to define duration-specific intake limits are essential. On the premise that carcinogenic risk is proportional to cumulative dose, the Less-Than-Lifetime (LTL) Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) framework defines progressively lower intake limits for mutagenic impurities over longer exposures. However, N-nitrosamines are currently treated as a cohort of concern, necessitating compound-specific evaluation placing reliance on in vivo mutagenicity assays for impurity qualifications. To better understand durational potency relationships and the application domain of the LTL-TTC, we apply benchmark dose (BMD) modelling to cumulative-dose-scaled transgenic rodent (TGR), error-corrected sequencing and rodent carcinogenicity datasets for N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) obtained from the published literature. For TGR, cumulative-dose scaling better resolved liver as the most sensitive organ and reduced interstudy variability: liver BMDs spanned [~]80-fold in daily-dose units but only [~]20-fold when scaled to cumulative dose. Among closely-matched mouse liver gavage studies, cumulative-dose BMDs only varied by [~]2.5-fold across 1 to 28-day treatment regimens. Error-corrected sequencing also demonstrated parity, with acute-dose regimens producing mutation burdens near-identical (< 1.2-fold) to those cumulated from 28-day repeat-dose regimens. Comparable results were obtained from carcinogenicity datasets confirming proportionality-of-effect to cumulative dose. These findings empirically support the validity of the LTL-TTC concept. More broadly, they demonstrate that short-term in vivo mutagenicity assays can serve as reliable surrogates for lifetime carcinogenicity studies, strengthening the scientific and regulatory basis for duration-adjusted acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamine impurities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
3
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
5
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
14
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%