Back

Regulation of interbacterial interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia by pqs quorum sensing

Frando, A.; Parsek, R. S.; Roberts, G. W.; Dandekar, A. A.

2026-01-27 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.27.702039 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen, uses a trio of quorum sensing (QS) systems to regulate the production of some virulence factors. Two of these, the las and rhl systems, involve acyl-homoserine lactone signals; the third, called pqs, primarily uses the signal 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4(1H)-quinolone ("PQS"). We aimed to identify how interbacterial interactions are regulated between P. aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, which co-occur in the airways of people with cystic fibrosis. We explored P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia interactions using a co-culture model. S. maltophilia in co-culture with P. aeruginosa grows for 12 hours and thereafter exhibits a large decline in CFU, demonstrating that P. aeruginosa is killing S. maltophilia. Co-culture of S. maltophilia with P. aeruginosa deficient in las, rhl, or pqs QS resulted in greater S. maltophilia viability than co-culture with the wildtype. This inhibition was not attributable to las and rhl-regulated toxins. Therefore, we interrogated the role of PQS and found that co-culture of S. maltophilia with P. aeruginosa deficient in PQS biosynthesis showed similar CFUs to monoculture. Exogenous PQS did not complement this phenotype, suggesting that another quinolone is the effector. We found that S. maltophilia killing is reduced in competition with a mutant that cannot make the quinolone HQNO. We show that full killing of S. maltophilia by P. aeruginosa requires three components: HQNO, the chaperone PqsE, and intact PQS biosynthesis. Our work identifies quinolone biosynthesis as a driver for interactions between P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia and, more generally, in modulating interbacterial interactions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.1%
2
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
11
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
13
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
24
Cellular Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%