Back

BESTish: A Diffusion-Approximation Framework for Inferring Selection and Mutation in Clonal Hematopoiesis

Wang, R.-Y.; Dinh, K. N.; Taketomi, K.; Pang, G.; King, K. Y.; Kimmel, M.

2026-01-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.27.702030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) arises when hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) gain a fitness advantage from somatic mutations and expand, resulting in an increase in variant allele frequency (VAF) over time. To analyze CH trajectories, we develop a state-dependent stochastic model of wild-type and mutant HSCs, in which an environmental parameter [isin] [0, 1] regulates death rates and interpolates between homeostatic (Moran-like, = 1) and growth-facilitating ( < 1) regimes. Using functional law of large numbers and central limit theorems, we derive explicit mean-field dynamics and a Gaussian-Markov approximation for VAF fluctuations. We show that the mean VAF trajectory has an explicit logistic form determined by selective advantage, while environmental effects affect only the variance and autocovariance structure. Building on these results, we introduce BESTish (Bayesian estimate for selection incorporating scaling-limit to detect mutant heterogeneity), a novel, efficient and accurate Bayesian inference method that can be applied to analyze both cohort-level and longitudinal VAF datasets. BESTish implements the closed-form finite-dimensional distributions that we derive to estimate mutation fitness, mutation rate, and environmental strength for individual CH drivers. When applied to existing CH datasets, BESTish produces consistent mutation fitness inferences across different studies, and estimates CH driver mutation rates in agreement with independent experimental studies. Furthermore, BESTish reveals patient-specific heterogeneity in the selective behavior of recurrent mutations, and identifies variants whose dynamics are compatible with non-homeostatic, growth-facilitating environments. BESTish provides a unified and mechanistic framework for quantifying CH evolution, with potential applications for other biological systems where clonal expansions can be measured.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.6%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.5%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
11
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
26
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
29
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%