Back

Aligning terrestrial eDNA sampling and analytical choices to effectively capture both rare species and compositional variation in grassland plant communities

Plue, J.; Topel, M.

2026-01-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.27.702028 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vascular plants are a major component of terrestrial diversity, yet they are overrepresented among the worlds threatened species. To effectively manage this biodiversity crisis, data with high spatiotemporal resolution are crucial, yet often lacking for plants. Environmental DNA analysis (eDNA) is capable of rapid detection of biodiversity by metabarcoding the collection of DNA molecules retrieved from environmental samples such as soil cores. The technology may soon support the generation of broad-scale longitudinal plant community data, yet much methodological work on sampling strategies and analytical choices remains if soil-based eDNA is to become a reliable tool for monitoring terrestrial plant communities. Therefore, this dual purpose study in seven Swedish semi-natural grasslands investigated if and when eDNA-generated community data can be used as a stand-alone information source 1) to inform on the presence of a rare, small-statured grassland specialist (Gentianella campestris) and 2) to simultaneously infer community compositional change. We demonstrate eDNA to be an effective means of finding a rare species in a highly taxonomically diverse habitat, uncovering G. campestris DNA in 31% of the core samples. Evidence suggests the eDNA signal reflects recent spatio-temporal population dynamics at fine spatial scales. Although the entire plant community was not uncovered, molecular community data proved a representative subset, effectively capturing changes in community diversity and composition at plot sizes commonly used for plant surveys. Choices surrounding typical RRA-filtering had significant bearing on eDNAs discriminating power: filtering may overly conservatively remove true observations of a rare species, while filtering highly localized plot noise led to more robust patterns emerging in species richness and plant composition turn-over. Given careful alignment of study goals and sampling strategies, soil-based eDNA may already provide a stand-alone tool for generating reliable, scalable and observer-independent longitudinal data for unveiling and monitoring changes in plant diversity in terrestrial habitats.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%