Back

Community Web Portal for Open Collaboration in the Martini Force Field Initiative

Ramirez-Echemendia, D. P.; Borges-Araujo, L.; Brown, C. M.; Alessandri, R.; Marrink, S.-J.; Telles de Souza, P. C.; Tieleman, D. P.

2026-01-29 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.27.701988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe Martini coarse-grained force field is widely used for biomolecular simulations by a large and rapidly expanding community worldwide. Over time, the development of Martini parameters, tools, and documentation has become increasingly dispersed across numerous research groups, leading to fragmentation and making it challenging for users and developers to keep track of the latest models, software, and best practices. Consequently, the development of Martini as a genuinely community-driven process has grown into a bottleneck. In response, the Martini Force Field Initiative (MFFI) has been established as an open-science effort to coordinate and support the collaborative development of all Martini resources. Here, we introduce the MFFI web portal, a platform designed around five core pillars: (i) avoiding reliance on a single group or local server; (ii) minimizing long-term maintenance overhead; (iii) reducing technical barriers for contributions; (iv) providing a unified home for parameters, tools, tutorials, example workflows, and research outputs; and (v) enabling timely dissemination of updates to the community. To achieve this, we use Quarto to generate a static website authored in Markdown, lowering the technical barrier to making contributions, and serverless architectures on Amazon Web Services for scalable, event-triggered backend operations. The source code is hosted in a public GitHub repository under an MIT license, with automated deployment via GitHub Actions and a contribution model based on pull requests for quality control. This design creates a sustainable, low-maintenance, and collaborative infrastructure that consolidates Martini resources and supports transparency. More broadly, our design exemplifies a transferable pattern for building open, community-oriented platforms for molecular modeling and computational science.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.5%
2
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
4
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
5
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
6
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.0%
10
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
23
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
24
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
25
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
26
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
28
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%