Back

Disentangling blade and vasculature shape in grapevine leaves

Yahiaoui, W.; Smail, S.; Ayub, Y.; Lu, Q.; Cousins, P.; Diaz-Garcia, L.; Frank, M.; Headland, L.; Martinez, C. C.; Migicovsky, Z. C.; Ranjan, A.; Sinha, N.; Swift, J. F.; Torres-Lomas, E.; Munch, E.; Laiadi, Z.; Chitwood, D. H.

2026-01-29 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.27.701982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The leaf blade and vasculature develop together within a shared morphological space. Despite shared molecular patterning pathways, it is unknown if developmental and evolutionary variation affect these tissues separately or together in a coordinated way. Grapevine leaves have a morphometric history and abundant data measuring the shape of the blade and vasculature together. Using a combination of topological data analysis and deep learning, we perform reciprocal semantic segmentation of leaf blade and vasculature. Each tissue contains sufficient information to predict the other. We hypothesize that this is due to a one-to-one relationship between blade and vein. Using thin plate splines to swap and warp different combinations of blade and vein shapes, we show that a set of leaves with a many-to-one relationship of blade and vein are distinguishable from true leaves. We also swap blade and vein across the developmental series and between species and show that only reversing the developmental series disrupts the relationship between blade and vasculature. We end by discussing the evolutionary and developmental implications that there is a unique, one-to-one mapping between blade and vein that allows each to be predicted from the other. Author summaryLeaves are made of two closely connected parts: the flat blade that captures light and the network of veins that transports water, nutrients, and developmental signals. Although these tissues grow together and share common molecular patterning pathways, it has remained unclear whether a particular blade shape is uniquely linked to a specific vein pattern. In this study, we use grapevine leaves as a model system and combine mathematical shape analysis with deep learning to examine this relationship. We show that the shape of the blade alone can accurately predict the vein network, and that the vein network can likewise predict the blade. This finding suggests a near one-to-one relationship between these two tissues. To test this idea, we created artificial leaves in which blade and vein shapes were deliberately mismatched. Although these synthetic leaves appeared realistic at a global level, a neural network was able to distinguish them from real leaves based on subtle differences. We further show that this tight coupling is maintained by the developmental sequence of leaf growth rather than by species identity, revealing a conserved constraint linking leaf form and internal structure.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
17.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.3%
3
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
5
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
12
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
16
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
19
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%