Back

Label-free imaging of matrix mineralization in alginate-encapsulated bone spheroids using Coherent Raman Scattering microscopy

Boscaro, D.; Nintemann, S. J.; Bjorkoy, A.; Sikorski, P.

2026-01-29 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.27.701971 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures, such as spheroids, are increasingly used to perform advanced studies on bone matrix mineralization. However, their full characterization remains challenging. Traditional colorimetric and fluorescent assays using dyes, such as Alizarin Red S (ARS) and calcein, are effective in monolayer cell cultures, but fail to provide reliable information when used in complex 3D cell constructs. In this study, we investigated the application of Coherent Raman Scattering microscopy for label-free, comprehensive characterization of extracellular matrix (ECM) mineralization in alginate-encapsulated bone spheroids. After confirming that traditional staining techniques are unreliable for mineral detection in spheroids, Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS) microscopy was used to detect phosphate-rich mineral deposits at a Raman shift of 960 cm-1, while Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy was used in association with SRS to provide complementary information on the deposition and organization of the collagenous matrix. SRS was used to detect lipid-rich regions at a Raman shift of 2857 cm-1 to perform cell localization. SRS imaging revealed the presence of phosphate-rich regions in the spheroids, including the core regions, usually challenging to characterize in intact 3D constructs. Raman spectral scans on SRS-positive regions confirmed the specificity of the phosphate signal. In addition, comparison of SRS and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) demonstrated the advantage of SRS in terms of reduced background compared to CARS for lipid imaging. Taken together, our results demonstrated that SRS, in combination with SHG, provides a promising and powerful approach to perform label-free, chemically specific characterization of intact 3D bone models.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
5
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
14
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
26
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%