Back

Axillary gland gene expression and potency reveal the nature of mimetic relationships in Corydoradinae catfishes

Phelps, E. C.; Bell, E. A.; Immler, S.; Taylor, M. I.

2026-01-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.27.701968 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolution of Mullerian or Batesian mimicry depends on the relative unpalatability of participating taxa, yet the mechanistic basis of such unpalatability remains poorly explored in many systems. Unpalatability in the Corydoradinae catfishes, known for their striking mimetic diversity, is underpinned by sharp, lockable spines, armoured bodies and the production of venoms/toxins. Here, we assess the contribution of the axillary gland, a structure at the base of the pectoral spine, to toxicity in two Corydoradinae genera, Corydoras and Hoplisoma. Using a brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay, we demonstrate that axillary gland extracts are significantly more toxic than muscle extracts in both genera, but toxicity does not differ significantly between genera. Transcriptomic analyses identified 539 candidate toxin genes upregulated in axillary gland tissue, relative to scute tissue, containing signal peptides and had predicted toxin functions based on amino acid sequences. Notably, candidate genes include domains typical of piscine venoms, such as lectins and peptidase S1. Although significant differences in gene expression were detected between genera in candidate toxins, log-fold changes were small, and predicted toxin potency was not significantly different between genera. Together, our findings indicate that axillary gland toxins are likely to contribute to unpalatability in Corydoradinae catfishes and provide support for Mullerian mimicry in this system.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Toxins
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
19
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
23
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%