Back

Global population structures and demographic history of Suillus luteus, a pine co-introduced ectomycorrhizal fungus associated with exotic forestry and invasion.

Ke, Y.-H.; Bazzicalupo, A.; Ruytinx, J.; Lofgren, L. A.; Bruns, T. D.; Branco, S.; Looney, B. P.; Hirose, D.; Tedersoo, L.; Peintner, U.; Rojas, J. A.; Liao, H.-L.; Plett, J. M.; Anderson, I.; Lipzen, A. M.; Kuo, A.; Barry, K. W.; Grigoriev, I.; Hoeksema, J. D.; Nguyen, N. H.; Kennedy, P.; Vilgalys, R.

2026-01-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.27.699563 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human colonization since the 19th century has resulted in the global spread of pines across the Southern Hemisphere, well beyond their original northern boreal distribution. Such introductions moved not only the pines but also expanded the distribution of their symbiotic partners. Although the introduction of pines is documented through historical records, little is known about the introduction history of their ectomycorrhizal fungi, which are critical symbionts for the survival and invasion of pines. Using Suillus luteus as an example, population genomic analyses of 208 individuals across both native and introduced ranges showed that all introductions originated from Europe, likely mediated by human activities along with pine introductions. With the exception of North America, introduced populations were genetically differentiated from the Europe population, with varying magnitudes of population expansion in different introduced regions, often linked to forestry practices. Genetic variation within the native European population followed isolation by distance, but not in the introduced range, highlighting the disparity in the spatial genetic patterns of native versus exotic habitats. This study provides insight into the population genetics of a globally introduced ectomycorrhizal fungus whose introduction process is likely applicable to other pine-co-introduced ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
12
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
14
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
20
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
26
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%