Gene-Specific Cancer Patterns in Pathogenic Germline Variant Carriers
Idumah, G.; Ribaudo, I.; Newell, D.; Ni, Y.; Arbesman, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundWe previously reported that >5% of the population carries pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in key cancer susceptibility genes. However, gene-specific cancer prevalence, spectrum, burden, lifetime risk, comorbidity, and the risk associated with autosomal recessive (AR) genes among carriers remain incompletely defined. MethodsWe analyzed 72 cancer susceptibility genes in the All of Us dataset (N=633,547), including 287,076 participants with both genomic and electronic health record data. Cancer diagnoses were identified using SNOMED codes and grouped into 35 categories. Associations between P/LPVs and overall and site-specific cancer risk were evaluated using regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. ResultsAmong genes with [≥]10 unique carriers, cancer prevalence was highest for MEN1 (80%), followed by TP53 (57.7%), MLH1 (48.4%), and MSH2 (47.2%). Carriers of P/LPVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, APC, NF1, PTEN, and PALB2 had significantly earlier cancer diagnosis compared to non-carriers. Cancer prevalence was markedly higher in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers who are also mono-allelic MUTYH carriers (75% and 45.5%, respectively) compared with BRCA1 and BRCA2 alone (43.2% and 36.5%). Adjusted survival analysis showed increased cancer risk for MLH1 (OR=6.08), PTEN (OR=5.80), and MSH2 (OR=5.19). Novel associations included MITF with anal/perianal and prostate cancer; BLM with ovarian and soft tissue/sarcoma; WRN with gynecologic cancer (NOS); and FH with hematologic malignancy. ConclusionsThis population-based analysis defines gene-specific cancer prevalence, spectrum, and risk, including contributions from AR variants, in the U.S. population. These findings support more precise genetic testing, screening, and risk stratification for individuals carrying inherited P/LPVs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 94%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 94%
- Genetic analysis of functional rare germline variants across 9 cancer types from the DiscovEHR study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 92%
- Restriction site associated DNA sequencing for tumour mutation burden estimation and mutation signature analysis 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
- Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Risk Based on Profiling with Common Genetic Variants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- APC Mutation marks an aggressive subtype of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers 94%
- Genomic risk prediction for breast cancer in older women 94%
- DNA mismatch repair gene variant classification: evaluating the utility of somatic mutations and mismatch repair deficient colonic crypts and endometrial glands 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 95%
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 95%
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.