Back

Machine Learning-Based Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Anemia in Children Using Palm Image Analysis

Keneshlou, F.; Rabiee, M.; K.Delos, M.

2026-01-30 hematology
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344955 medRxiv
Show abstract

Anemia, particularly iron-deficiency anemia, is a critical global health concern, with a high prevalence among children under six years of age. Early and non-invasive detection can significantly improve health outcomes. This study proposes a computer vision and machine learning framework for anemia screening and hemoglobin (Hb) level prediction using palmar images from pediatric subjects. The region of interest (palm) was segmented using a U-Net model, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.96. Images were processed across RGB, CIELab, and HSV color spaces to extract key color features, including red fraction, erythema index, and normalized a-component. For anemia classification, multiple machine learning models were evaluated, with Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) achieving the highest test accuracies of approximately 94.5% and 95.53%, respectively. For hemoglobin regression, a Random Forest model in the CIELab color space achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95. The Pearson correlation coefficient in the Lab color space was 0.98 for the Random Forest algorithm and 0.94 for the Linear Regression algorithm. The analysis, supported by SHAP values, identified red-related color features as the most significant predictors. The model demonstrated robust performance across different skin tones, with particularly high accuracy (R2 = 0.9926) in darker-skinned individuals, who constituted the majority of the studied Iranian population. The results confirm that pallor analysis of palmar images using artificial intelligence techniques offers a reliable, non-invasive, and effective tool for pediatric anemia screening and hemoglobin estimation, with strong potential for point-of-care applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.5%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
9
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
11
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%