Back

Functional Connectivity Predictors and Mechanisms of Symptom Change in Functional Neurological Disorder

Westlin, C.; Bleier, C.; Guthrie, A. J.; Finkelstein, S. A.; Maggio, J.; Ranford, J.; MacLean, J.; Godena, E.; Millstein, D.; Freeburn, J.; Adams, C.; Stephen, C. D.; Diez, I.; Perez, D.

2026-01-30 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344860 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical trajectories in functional neurological disorder (FND) are variable, and the mechanisms underlying this heterogeneity remain poorly understood. ObjectiveThis longitudinal study examined resting-state functional connectivity predictors and mechanisms of symptom change in FND. MethodsThirty-two adults with FND (motor and/or seizure phenotypes) completed baseline questionnaires and a functional MRI (fMRI) session, followed by naturalistic treatment for 6.8{+/-}0.8 months. All participants completed follow-up questionnaires; 28 individuals completed a follow-up fMRI. At each timepoint, three graph-theory network metrics of functional connectivity were computed: weighted-degree (centrality), integration (between-network connectivity), and segregation (within-network connectivity). Analyses adjusted for age, sex, anti-depressants, head motion, time between sessions, and baseline score-of-interest, with cluster-wise correction. Results were contextualized against 50 age-, sex-, and head motion-matched healthy controls (HCs). ResultsBased on patient-reported Clinical Global Impression of Improvement, 59.4% improved, 31.3% were unchanged, and 9.3% worsened. Psychometric scores of core FND symptoms and non-core physical symptoms showed variable trajectories, with no group-level changes. Greater improvement in core FND symptoms was associated with higher baseline between-network integrated connectivity and reduced integration longitudinally within salience, frontoparietal, and default mode network regions. Right anterior insula integration emerged as a prognostic marker and mechanistic site of reorganization, with the most improved participants showing elevated baseline integration compared to HCs. Increased baseline within-network segregated connectivity in dorsal attention network regions correlated with non-core physical symptom improvement. Findings remained significant adjusting for FND phenotype. ConclusionsThis study identified large-scale network interactions as potential prognostic and mechanistically-relevant sites of reorganization related to symptom change in FND.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.0%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
5
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
7
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
8
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
24
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%