Back

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort

Narasimhan, R. M.; Saini, A. S.; Samimi, K.; Ogobuiro, I.; Zhao, X.; Han, S.; Takita, C.; Taswell, C. S.

2026-02-02 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344082 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSPurpose/ObjectivesC_ST_ABSThe role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), remains controversial in the era of modern systemic therapy. We evaluated the association between PMRT and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and identified prognostic factors in a contemporary single-institution pN1 cohort. Materials/MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed female patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy between 2016 and 2022. RFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by PMRT status with log-rank testing. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between clinical factors--including tumor laterality, receptor subtype (TNBC vs non-TNBC), nodal burden, and adjuvant therapies--and survival outcomes, with subgroup analyses by PMRT status and receptor subtype. ResultsFifty-seven patients were included; 22 (38.6%) received PMRT. With a median follow-up of 85 months, PMRT was not associated with improved RFS (median 133 vs 120 months; p=0.256) or OS (not reached vs 195 months; p=0.154). Hormone therapy was significantly associated with improved RFS (HR 0.43; p=0.026) and OS (HR 0.13; p=0.003), while having 2-3 positive lymph nodes predicted worse RFS (HR 2.86; p=0.007). No significant differential benefit from PMRT was observed in patients with TNBC or non-TNBC disease. ConclusionsPMRT was not associated with a survival benefit in this pN1 cohort, including patients with TNBC. Interpretation is limited by modest sample size and statistical power. Outcomes appeared driven by tumor biology, nodal burden, and systemic therapy, supporting individualized PMRT decision-making.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
3
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
9
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
PLOS ONE · published here
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
12
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
19
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%