Back

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort

Narasimhan, R. M.; Saini, A. S.; Samimi, K.; Ogobuiro, I.; Zhao, X.; Han, S.; Takita, C.; Taswell, C. S.

2026-02-02 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344082 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSPurpose/ObjectivesC_ST_ABSThe role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), remains controversial in the era of modern systemic therapy. We evaluated the association between PMRT and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and identified prognostic factors in a contemporary single-institution pN1 cohort. Materials/MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed female patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy between 2016 and 2022. RFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by PMRT status with log-rank testing. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between clinical factors--including tumor laterality, receptor subtype (TNBC vs non-TNBC), nodal burden, and adjuvant therapies--and survival outcomes, with subgroup analyses by PMRT status and receptor subtype. ResultsFifty-seven patients were included; 22 (38.6%) received PMRT. With a median follow-up of 85 months, PMRT was not associated with improved RFS (median 133 vs 120 months; p=0.256) or OS (not reached vs 195 months; p=0.154). Hormone therapy was significantly associated with improved RFS (HR 0.43; p=0.026) and OS (HR 0.13; p=0.003), while having 2-3 positive lymph nodes predicted worse RFS (HR 2.86; p=0.007). No significant differential benefit from PMRT was observed in patients with TNBC or non-TNBC disease. ConclusionsPMRT was not associated with a survival benefit in this pN1 cohort, including patients with TNBC. Interpretation is limited by modest sample size and statistical power. Outcomes appeared driven by tumor biology, nodal burden, and systemic therapy, supporting individualized PMRT decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
3
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
19
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%