Back

Zinc-Finger Motifs Unique To Arabidopsis Thaliana Paralogs Rpa1C And Rpa1E Are Required For Rpa-Dependent DNA Repair

Mills, I.; Culligan, K. M.

2026-01-28 genetics
10.64898/2026.01.26.701817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RPA is a heterotrimeric ssDNA binding protein that is highly conserved across all eukaryotes. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has five RPA1 paralogs divided into three groups (A, B, C) each with unique functions in DNA replication and repair. The group C paralogs (RPA1C and RPA1E in Arabidopsis) function specifically in DNA-damage repair and carry a C-terminal extension unique to group-C paralogs. This C-terminal extension contains a zinc finger motif (ZFM) that is highly conserved and is therefore predicted to be critical to the functionality of the paralogs during DNA damage repair. To address this, we employed a CRISPR-Cas9 strategy to specifically remove the ZFM from RPA1C or RPA1E while leaving the genes otherwise intact (termed C-ZFKO and E-ZFKO). C-ZFKO and E-ZFKO lines were challenged with DNA damaging agents, and their susceptibility was compared to both WT (Col-0) lines and to previously characterized T-DNA null mutants (rpa1c and rpa1e). To address the role of the respective ZFMs in homologous recombination pathways (HRR), we employed a GUS-reporter system to compare WT lines to C-ZFKO and E-ZFKO lines. We find here that C-ZFKO and E-ZFKO lines displayed hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents at a level comparable to previously characterized T-DNA null mutants (rpa1c and rpa1e). When studying the rate of HRR, both C-ZFKO and rpa1c showed a drastic reduction in single-strand annealing (SSA) while E-ZFKO and rpa1e had a more modest, but still significant decrease. All mutant lines had a comparable decrease in synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) compared to WT. Thus, we show here that the respective RPA1C and RPA1E-encoded ZFM is crucial for the ability of each paralog to function during DNA damage repair.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.7%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
DNA Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.5%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
19
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%