Back

Native Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Reveals the Mechanism of Hemophore Release by Pathogenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae

Goring, A. K.; Lyman, L. R.; Ford, J.; Huang, J.; Mullen, C.; Melani, R. D.; Schmitt, M. P.; Clubb, R. T.; Loo, J. A.

2026-01-27 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.26.701814 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron is an essential micronutrient for nearly all forms of life, including pathogenic microbes that must acquire it from their host during infection. At the host-pathogen interface, humans restrict microbial access to iron through nutritional immunity, which many pathogens overcome by secreting hemophores that scavenge extracellular heme (iron protoporphyrin IX). However, identifying hemophores and other ligand-binding proteins in complex proteomes remains challenging using conventional peptide-based bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS). Here, we introduce ProteoMIX (Proteome Analysis by Mixing), a function-based native top-down proteomics workflow that combines slow-mixing mode native MS with charge reduction to identify ligand-binding proteins directly from complex mixtures. Applying ProteoMIX to the Corynebacterium diphtheriae exoproteome identified ChtA30-314, an abundant soluble hemophore generated by proteolytic processing of the surface-exposed ChtA heme receptor. Using native top-down MS sequencing, cell fractionation, and gene deletion, we show that the protease DIP2069 releases ChtA30-314 by removing ChtAs transmembrane helix, producing a soluble proteoform that delivers heme to support microbial growth. In contrast, the related paralog ChtC is not processed, enabling C. diphtheriae to generate localization-specific heme-binding proteoforms from related gene products. Extending this approach to Staphylococcus aureus, ProteoMIX also revealed soluble IsdA hemophores that coexist with surface-anchored variants, demonstrating the generality of the method and suggesting that protease-mediated hemophore release may operate across gram-positive pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.