Back

Ancient human genomes from Ladakh reveal Tibetan, South Asian, and Central Asian admixture over the last three millennia

Rai, N.; Ahlawat, B.; Dwivedi, A.; Gupta, S.; Konar, S.; Bandyopadhyay, E.; Urban Aragon, J. A.; Witonsky, D.; Rajpal, R.; Garg, P.; Rashmi, ; Vuppulury, C.; Baghel, P. S.; Agrawal, S.; Spalzin, S.; Ldawa Thsangspa, T.; Raghavan, M.

2026-01-28 genetics
10.64898/2026.01.26.701789 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The trans-Himalayan region of Ladakh occupies a strategic position at the crossroads of South Asia, the Tibetan Plateau, and Central Asia, with archaeological evidence pointing to long-term cultural exchanges across these regions. However, the human genetic history of Ladakh remains largely unexplored. We generated paleogenomic data from seven individuals recovered from two sites in Western Ladakh - the Old Lady Spider Cave and Hanu - of which six are dated to 531-585 CE and one to the 19th century CE. The older individuals share substantial genetic ancestry with Tibetan groups but also harbor major contributions from two additional sources: one corresponding to the currently-oldest observation of the Ancestral North Indian genetic component that characterizes several present-day populations in North India and Pakistan, and another related to ancient Central Asian groups, with admixture events occurring between [~]2,100-2,500 years ago. In contrast, the later individual falls within a previously described ancient northern Himalayan genetic cline based on [~]1,100-1,300-year-old individuals from Himachal Pradesh, with ancestries related to ancient Tibetan and Steppe-related sources. Stable isotope analysis suggests that these individuals were local to Ladakh in late life and practiced an agro-pastoralist subsistence. Our study establishes that Ladakhs central role in Eurasian economic and socio-cultural networks was shaped by dynamic and sustained gene flow linking high-altitude Himalayan groups with both lowland South Asia and Inner Asia.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.