Back

Noninvasive and Objective Near Real-Time Detection of Pain Changes in Fluctuating Pain

Visser, L.; Buechel, C.

2026-01-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.26.701710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic pain involves natural intensity fluctuations that patients cannot control, contributing to learned helplessness and functional impairment. Detecting spontaneous pain decreases could enable precisely timed interventions that enhance perceived control. However, existing research on objective pain assessment has focused primarily on estimating static intensity from short, predictable stimuli rather than detecting moment-to-moment changes in ongoing pain. This study investigated whether pain decreases can be detected objectively using easily obtainable physiological signals during fluctuating pain. We recorded multiple physiological signals (8-channel EEG, electrodermal activity, heart rate, pupil diameter, facial expressions) from 42 healthy participants (Mage = 26.2 years, SD = 5.1) during calibrated tonic heat pain stimulation on the left forearm with unpredictable intensity fluctuations (0-70 on visual analogue scale; twelve 3-minute trials). Temperature changes lasted 5-20 seconds. Using minimal preprocessing suitable for real-time applications, we trained state-of-the-art deep learning models to classify pain decreases versus non-decreases from brief temporal windows on a held-out test set (9 participants). Combining electrodermal activity, heart rate, and pupil diameter yielded optimal classification performance using a transformer-based architecture (AUROC = 0.854, accuracy = 76.8%). Electrodermal activity emerged as the most informative single predictor. Continuous stream analysis demonstrated median detection latency of 5.75 seconds with 70.4% sensitivity, reducible to 4.25 seconds at the cost of increased false positives. Results indicate that electrodermal activity and heart rate enable straightforward practical deployment, while highly variable signals such as EEG and facial expressions require personalized fine-tuned models. These findings establish a basis for closed-loop interventions targeting spontaneous pain changes. SummaryDeep learning models detect pain decreases using electrodermal activity, heart rate, and pupil diameter (AUROC=0.854, 5.75s latency), facilitating precisely timed interventions for fluctuating tonic pain.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
11.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%