Back

Neural modes in motor cortex cycle over fast timescales

Clarke, S. E.; Jun, E. J.; Nuyujukian, P.

2026-01-26 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.26.701671 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The embedding of low-dimensional latent states in the activity of large neuron populations has become a tenet of systems neuroscience. Despite the stability of these latent representations over time,1 the underlying activity of individual neurons is known to change both within experimental sessions and across days;2 yet, less attention has been devoted to changes in the coordinated activity of neuron populations on short timescales, particularly under conditions where networks must adapt quickly (e.g., during learning or after injury). To investigate, patterns of individual neuron contributions to population state dimensions in motor cortex were tracked over short blocks of repeated reaching trials. The number of distinct encoding patterns was consistently less than the typical dimensionality reported for motor cortex. Although the neuron population state space and dynamics were effectively conserved, these underlying encoding patterns changed in two ways: fast switches among themselves, as well as slow modifications over time. To explore whether these two drift timescales shared a common physiological mechanism, we analyzed the response of motor cortex to a causal perturbation. Direct electrical current was passed through two recording electrodes to terminate a small number of neurons,3-6 which evoked drift over both fast and slow timescales, both together and independently. While changes in fast switch rates were not necessarily associated with behavioral deficits, a significant increase in slow drift was accompanied by a decrease in behavioral performance. Together, these results reveal an additional timescale of drift in correlated population activity that could help guide the discovery of cellular and network mechanisms responsible for the maintenance, (re)learning, and recovery of low-dimensional structure in neuron populations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
20.0%
3
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.4%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.2%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
14
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
15
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
18
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
19
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
24
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%