Back

Mechanically competitive regulation of cell volume in cytoplasm-sharing cells connected by intercellular bridges

Koyama, H.; Ikami, K.; Lei, L.; Fujimori, T.

2026-01-27 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.01.26.701669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In multicellular organisms, various cellular structures exhibit cytoplasmic sharing, where cells remain interconnected. While essential for development and function in contexts such as germ cell formation and insect early embryos, the physical basis of cell volume regulation in these systems remains poorly defined. Germline cysts are formed by interconnected sister cells via intercellular bridges. In mice, germline cysts form during gametogenesis in fetal ovaries and testes. In mouse fetal female cysts, cells with numerous bridges preferentially differentiate into oocytes by selectively increasing their volume, a process that may be mediated through cytoplasmic flow. This volume bias may be influenced by hydrostatic pressure within the cytoplasm. Here, we theoretically investigate how the mechanical properties of cells affect cytoplasmic pressure and volume distribution within interconnected cells. Our soap-bubble model revealed that cells with more bridges exhibit increased volume when they have large cell-cell contact areas, as observed in fetal cysts. We found that incorporating cell cycle (including cell growth and cell division) significantly enhances the likelihood of volume bias in favor of cells with more bridges. These theoretical findings suggest that intrinsic mechanical properties, coupled with cell cycle, establish robust cyst development in fetal female germline cysts. Our findings also provide insights into the volume dynamics observed in adult male germline cysts, which are characterized by smaller cell-cell contact areas. Impact statementA theoretical model demonstrates how mechanical properties and cell cycle dynamics regulate volume distribution in germline cysts, providing a physical basis for oocyte differentiation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
2
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
8
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
15
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%