Back

Association Between SARS-CoV-2 Mutations and Disease Severity Reveals Risk and Protective Effects Among Community-Sampled Patients in Israel

Eliyahu, H.; Barda, N.; Mandelboim, M.; Lustig, Y.; Zuckerman, N. s.

2026-01-29 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344903 medRxiv
Show abstract

SARS-CoV-2 mutations play a key role in viral evolution, in immune escape, and potentially in disease severity. However, the clinical impact of most mutations remains poorly understood, particularly across different variants. A historical observational study was conducted using SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing data linked to clinical metadata from 175,503 COVID-19 cases in Israel. The dataset was stratified into four variant-specific periods: B.1.1.7, B.1.617.2, BA.1, and BA.2. Logistic regression models were applied separately within each period to assess the association between individual mutations and the need for hospitalization, adjusting for age, gender, and time since vaccination. False discovery rate correction was used to account for multiple testing. A total of 18 SARS-CoV-2 mutations were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity, of which eight remained statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. Among these, two were associated with increased risk and six with reduced risk. Most were non-synonymous mutations located in functionally relevant regions such as the spike protein and non-structural proteins. This study provides a variant-stratified assessment of SARS-CoV-2 mutations associated with clinical severity, revealing both known and novel associations. The findings highlight the importance of integrating genomic and clinical data in public health surveillance and may inform future outbreak preparedness by identifying mutations with potential clinical impact.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
2
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%