Back

Hospital pharmacy leader perspectives on advocating for clinical pharmacy services: A national survey

Duong, H.; Karnbach, M.; Keedy, C.; Henry, K.; Heavner, M.; Murray, B.; Ghaffari, M.; Majchrzak, J.; Swarthout, M. D.; Sikora, A.; Smith, S. E.

2026-01-27 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344866 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAlthough numerous research studies have demonstrated the positive impact of clinical pharmacy services, these benefits do not translate into sustained practice changes without support from hospital pharmacy leaders. Factors influencing leadership decisions to expand pharmacy services remained unclear. This study aimed to identify barriers to implementing pharmacy practice model changes and gain insights on potential methods of overcoming these barriers from the hospital pharmacy leader perspective. SummaryWe conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of hospital pharmacy leaders using the REDCap platform, distributed via email over three weeks between September to October 2025. The survey included questions about perceptions related to implementation of practice model changes, resources/evidence used to justify clinical positions, barriers to expanding clinical pharmacy services, and demographics of healthcare systems they represented. The survey included Likert-scales and open-ended questions. The primary outcome was types of evidence most compelling to justify clinical pharmacist positions. Secondary outcomes included resources currently in use for decision-making and perceived barriers. The survey highlighted key factors influencing administrative decision-making regarding the expansion of clinical pharmacy services and revealed significant barriers to justifying clinical positions related to knowledge gaps, underscoring the need for further research to develop evidence-based metrics that capture the comprehensive benefits that clinical pharmacists can offer. ConclusionThis survey provided valuable insights into hospital pharmacy leader perspectives on resources and evidence needed to support expanded pharmacy services and justify clinical pharmacist positions. These insights can inform future research by ensuring that metrics that are both clinically and administratively significant are included in outcomes. Key pointsO_LIWhile clinical pharmacy services are known to improve patient care, their benefits do not lead to expanded and/or sustained practice changes without hospital pharmacy leader support. C_LIO_LIThis cross-sectional survey of hospital pharmacy leaders identified perceptions, resources and barriers to justifying clinical pharmacist positions. C_LIO_LIThis study highlights gaps in hospital pharmacy leader perceptions and knowledge, providing a foundation for developing evidence-based tools and targeted strategies to expand clinical pharmacy services, improve quality of care, and support clinician sustainability. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.6%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
11
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%