Hospital pharmacy leader perspectives on advocating for clinical pharmacy services: A national survey
Duong, H.; Karnbach, M.; Keedy, C.; Henry, K.; Heavner, M.; Murray, B.; Ghaffari, M.; Majchrzak, J.; Swarthout, M. D.; Sikora, A.; Smith, S. E.
Show abstract
PurposeAlthough numerous research studies have demonstrated the positive impact of clinical pharmacy services, these benefits do not translate into sustained practice changes without support from hospital pharmacy leaders. Factors influencing leadership decisions to expand pharmacy services remained unclear. This study aimed to identify barriers to implementing pharmacy practice model changes and gain insights on potential methods of overcoming these barriers from the hospital pharmacy leader perspective. SummaryWe conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of hospital pharmacy leaders using the REDCap platform, distributed via email over three weeks between September to October 2025. The survey included questions about perceptions related to implementation of practice model changes, resources/evidence used to justify clinical positions, barriers to expanding clinical pharmacy services, and demographics of healthcare systems they represented. The survey included Likert-scales and open-ended questions. The primary outcome was types of evidence most compelling to justify clinical pharmacist positions. Secondary outcomes included resources currently in use for decision-making and perceived barriers. The survey highlighted key factors influencing administrative decision-making regarding the expansion of clinical pharmacy services and revealed significant barriers to justifying clinical positions related to knowledge gaps, underscoring the need for further research to develop evidence-based metrics that capture the comprehensive benefits that clinical pharmacists can offer. ConclusionThis survey provided valuable insights into hospital pharmacy leader perspectives on resources and evidence needed to support expanded pharmacy services and justify clinical pharmacist positions. These insights can inform future research by ensuring that metrics that are both clinically and administratively significant are included in outcomes. Key pointsO_LIWhile clinical pharmacy services are known to improve patient care, their benefits do not lead to expanded and/or sustained practice changes without hospital pharmacy leader support. C_LIO_LIThis cross-sectional survey of hospital pharmacy leaders identified perceptions, resources and barriers to justifying clinical pharmacist positions. C_LIO_LIThis study highlights gaps in hospital pharmacy leader perceptions and knowledge, providing a foundation for developing evidence-based tools and targeted strategies to expand clinical pharmacy services, improve quality of care, and support clinician sustainability. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal 92%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 91%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 92%
- Drug Supply Management at First-level Public Health Facilities: Case of Pyay District, Myanmar 91%
- Healthcare Consumers’ Perceptions of Incentive-Linked Prescribing: A Scoping Review of Research 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody infusion sites at three medical centers in the United States: Strengths and challenges assessment to inform COVID-19 pandemic and future public health emergency use 93%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practices of Community pharmacists about COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey in two provinces of Pakistan. 89%
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.