Back

Evaluating the impact of age on prostate cancer overdiagnosis using long-term follow-up from a randomised trial

Brentnall, A. R.; Rebolj, M.; Sasieni, P.; Funston, G.; Gabe, R.; Vickers, A.

2026-01-28 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344830 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prostate cancer overdiagnosis is detection of prostate cancer through PSA testing that otherwise would not have been diagnosed within the patients lifetime. It is a major concern to policymakers due to its impact on quality of life. We used long-term followup data from the CAP randomised trial of a one-off screen, and English male competing mortality rates (2021-23), to estimate the impact of age on excess prostate cancer incidence within 15 years ( overdiagnosis) using competing risks methods. In total, 2249 (1.19%) of 189,386 men invited for a PSA test in CAP had cancer detected at the one-off screen. Prostate cancer cumulative incidence at 15 years was 7.08% (95%CI 6.95 to 7.21%) in those invited to screening, compared with 6.94% (95%CI 6.82 to 7.06%) in the control arm; an absolute excess incidence difference of 0.14% (95%CI -0.04% to 0.37%). Excess net incidence to 15 years was 0.14/1.19 = 11.7% (95%CI 0.0% to 26.7%) of cases detected at a single prevalent screen. Accounting for competing mortality, English men diagnosed aged 50 years were projected to have a 16% chance the cancer would not have been detected within 15 years, rising to 32% aged 70 years and 58% aged 80 years. Thus, prostate cancer overdiagnosis rises substantially with age due to competing mortality, and is relatively low for younger men. Accordingly, opportunistic testing policies should be re-examined in settings where they have led to high rates of screening in older men.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%