Evaluating the impact of age on prostate cancer overdiagnosis using long-term follow-up from a randomised trial
Brentnall, A. R.; Rebolj, M.; Sasieni, P.; Funston, G.; Gabe, R.; Vickers, A.
Show abstract
Prostate cancer overdiagnosis is detection of prostate cancer through PSA testing that otherwise would not have been diagnosed within the patients lifetime. It is a major concern to policymakers due to its impact on quality of life. We used long-term followup data from the CAP randomised trial of a one-off screen, and English male competing mortality rates (2021-23), to estimate the impact of age on excess prostate cancer incidence within 15 years ( overdiagnosis) using competing risks methods. In total, 2249 (1.19%) of 189,386 men invited for a PSA test in CAP had cancer detected at the one-off screen. Prostate cancer cumulative incidence at 15 years was 7.08% (95%CI 6.95 to 7.21%) in those invited to screening, compared with 6.94% (95%CI 6.82 to 7.06%) in the control arm; an absolute excess incidence difference of 0.14% (95%CI -0.04% to 0.37%). Excess net incidence to 15 years was 0.14/1.19 = 11.7% (95%CI 0.0% to 26.7%) of cases detected at a single prevalent screen. Accounting for competing mortality, English men diagnosed aged 50 years were projected to have a 16% chance the cancer would not have been detected within 15 years, rising to 32% aged 70 years and 58% aged 80 years. Thus, prostate cancer overdiagnosis rises substantially with age due to competing mortality, and is relatively low for younger men. Accordingly, opportunistic testing policies should be re-examined in settings where they have led to high rates of screening in older men.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: a multinational population study 89%
- Comprehensive analysis of prostate cancer life expectancy, loss of life expectancy, and healthcare expenditures: Taiwan national cohort study spanning 2008 to 2019 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between Lipoprotein A and other lipids with prostate cancer risk: A multivariable Mendelian randomisation study 89%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 88%
- Genetically-proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 94%
- Prescribing patterns for medical treatment of suspected prostatic obstruction: A spatiotemporal statistical analysis of Scottish open access data 90%
- An economic evaluation of two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying a genetic risk score for prostate cancer to men with lower urinary tract symptoms in primary care to predict prostate cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in the UK Biobank 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 89%
- The impact of COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England on excess diagnoses 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 88%
- The relationships between women’s reproductive factors: a Mendelian randomization analysis 87%
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.