Back

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older In-patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Cognitive Impairment: A feasibility study

Donat Ergin, B.; Mattishent, K.; Minihane, A. M.; Holt, R.; Murphy, H. R.; Dhatariya, K.; Hornberger, M.

2026-01-27 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344013
Show abstract

BackgroundType 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cognitive impairment are common long-term chronic conditions affecting older people in hospital. Cognitive impairment can complicate glucose monitoring and lead to diabetes-related emergencies in T2DM. Traditionally, point of care test (POCT) measurements of capillary blood glucose are conducted in-hospital for T2DM while continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is not widely used. AimTo understand the feasibility, acceptability and tolerability of using CGM in older in-patients with T2DM and cognitive impairment. MethodsThirty-two older people (mean age = 78.7 {+/-}6.7 years) with comorbid T2DM and cognitive impairment (AMT [≤]8/10 and Mini-ACE [≤]22/30) were recruited within a tertiary care hospital in the UK. All participants were naive to CGM and were asked to wear blinded Dexcom G7 sensors for up to 10 days. Participants were asked about feasibility, acceptability and tolerability questions at the point of sensor removal. ResultsTwenty-nine participants (96%) reported no pain during CGM fitting. All participants (100%) agreed that they did not notice wearing the sensor, and it did not affect their day-to-day hospital activities. All participants (100%) found it very easy or easy to have the sensor fitted and wearing it for 10 days, with 27 participants (90%) finding CGM convenient. Seventeen participants (57%) reported favourable perceptions of the subcutaneous sensor sensation. ConclusionCGM use in older in-patients with T2DM and cognitive impairment is highly feasible and acceptable for patients. Future studies and trials are now needed to evaluate the clinical use of CGM for glucose monitoring in hospitalised or community-dwelling older individuals with T2DM and cognitive impairment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 4%
17.8%
3
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
5.8%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 67%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
3.2%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 0.8%
2.0%
9
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
15
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
16
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
based on 12 papers
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Gait & Posture
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 85%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 36%
0.5%
25
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 7%
0.5%