Back

Integration of UAS-based spatial surveys and bio-logging tracking enhances precision in population size estimation

Inoue, S.; Mizutani, Y.; Sugiyama, H.; Goto, Y.; Yoda, K.

2026-01-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurately estimating wildlife population sizes, essential for ecological theory and conservation management, yet remains challenging. Although unmanned aerial systems (UASs) combined with machine learning, have revolutionized population estimation, they face limitations in addressing the hierarchical population processes from individual behavior to colony-and population-level dynamics. To overcome this limitation, we developed a data integration framework that jointly analyzes multiple datasets, representing different scales of the same underlying process, were jointly analyzed. Using a seabird colony as a model system, we integrated UAS-based count data in the colony with bio-logging-based tracking data to estimate population size by quantifying both the number of individuals present and the proportion absent from the surveyed area. These complementary datasets were linked using state-space models allowing accurate population estimates with explicit uncertainty quantification. Furthermore, we evaluated the robustness of the estimations with respect to sample size. Sub-sampling simulations revealed that estimation uncertainty was more sensitive to sample size in bio-logging-based tracking data than in UAS-based count data. This finding highlights the importance of understanding dataset-specific properties when designing effective investigations. Overall, our resource-efficient framework is broadly applicable across species and populations and demonstrates how integrating complementary observation methods can improve population estimates and inform conservation practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
29
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%