Back

Sexual size dimorphism increases with body size at the intraspecific level in Drosophila melanogaster

Zhang, Y.; Jin, Q.; Xi, X.

2026-01-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD), the difference in body size between males and females, typically conforms to Renschs rule across species: SSD increases with body size when males are larger but decreases when females are larger. Although this macroevolutionary pattern has been extensively documented, intraspecific analyses remain rare, yet they are essential for understanding the proximate mechanisms underlying the origin and maintenance of sexual dimorphism. In particular, it remains unclear whether within-species variation in SSD is driven primarily by sex-specific differences in growth rate or in development time. Here, we addressed this question by examining SSD scaling in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster from the well-established Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) reared under two thermal environments (25 {degrees}C and 28 {degrees}C). Females were consistently larger than males, resulting in pronounced female-biased SSD across different lines of this model insect. Moreover, SSD increased with overall body size, representing a reversal of Renschs rule at the intraspecific level. This scaling pattern was largely explained by higher female growth rates rather than sexual differences in development time. Elevated temperature reduced SSD by decreasing female growth rate while slightly enhancing that of males. Together, our results demonstrate that Renschs rule does not universally apply at intraspecific level and underscore the critical role of growth rate and environmental sensitivity in shaping SSD at the intraspecific level.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
7
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
14
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
18
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
22
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%