Back

Saddle-Node Bifurcation in Macrophage Proliferation Determines Atherosclerotic Plaque Stability

Endes, E. A.; PELEN, N. N.

2026-01-27 physiology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701595 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atherosclerotic plaques are fatty deposits in arterial walls and a major cause of heart attacks and strokes. Macrophage proliferation triggers plaque growth and instability, but the exact conditions that cause stable plaques to become unstable remain unclear. To provide an insight into the conditions for this transition, we apply bifurcation analysis to the lipid-structured atherosclerosis model proposed by Chambers et al. (Bull Math Biol 86(8):104, 2024). Our main contribution is that the reduced dynamics of the system remain meaningful even beyond previously identified limits of validity. Furthermore, along with numerical bifurcation methods, the use of fast-slow analysis, combined with Fenichels theory, identifies a saddle-node bifurcation at infinity. A sharp threshold exists where macrophage proliferation balances emigration. Below this balance, the system stabilises in a biologically reasonable state; contrary to above it, macrophage numbers and lipid load grow unboundedly, triggering instability and runaway inflammation. Trends in determinant and eigenvalues also support this threshold. Parameter scans and heatmaps demonstrate that increased proliferation or reduced emigration enhances the number of macrophages and the lipid content of the necrotic core. Efferocytosis rate modulates downstream severity but does not shift the primary threshold. These findings reconcile conflicting results on macrophage proliferation, demonstrating that it is protective when emigration sufficiently balances this process. In other words, co-targeting reduced macrophage proliferation and enhanced emigration could help maintain plaque stability and reduce the risk of acute cardiovascular events. While this remains a theoretical recommendation, it offers a potential therapeutic strategy that authorises further investigation in experimental and clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
3
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
8
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
15
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
25
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%