Back

CRISPR-enabled genetic screens identify synthetic lethal targets across frequently altered cancer drivers

Desjardins, J.; Bowlan, J.; Bernier, C.; Jain, S.; Goullet de Rugy, T.; Gallo, D.; Orcholski, M. E.; Laterreur, N.; Rajah, A.; Miller, J.; Lafontaine, J.; Bhaskaran, V.; Li, L.; Ling, A.; Leblanc, J. H.; Mathieu, M.-C.; Zinda, M.; Morris, S. J.; Durocher, D.; Zimmermann, M.; Roulston, A.; Veloso, A.; Fiore, C.; Alvarez-Quilon, A.; Young, J. T.

2026-01-25 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701589 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) provides a treatment paradigm for targeting cancer with alterations in driver genes that are not conventionally druggable, including loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in tumor suppressor genes and gain-of-function (GoF) alterations in oncogenes. We undertook a series of genome-wide CRISPR screens using functionally validated isogenic cell lines and also conducted a large-scale SL analysis using data from the cancer dependency map (DepMap). We charted SL interactions across 15 genetic alterations characteristic of diseases with high incidence and unmet clinical need: FBXW7, CCNE1, CDK12, ARID1A, KMT2D, DNMT3A, TET2, KEAP1, STK11, IDH1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, chromosome 18q loss, and chromosome 13q loss. We show validation of several SL interactions between tractable targets with cancer drivers, including ARID1A and the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway aminotransferase GFPT1, STK11 with CAMK protein kinase family members including MARK2, FBXW7 and the CDK1 regulatory kinase PKMYT1, and CCNE1 amplification and the anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C). In summary, this study offers a rich resource of genetic interactions across cancer drivers enabling the discovery of new biological insights and drug targets for future therapeutic development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.