Back

NLR immune receptors can exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns across legume species

Marques, R. M.; Santos, C.; Pai, H.; Patto, M. C. V.; Kamoun, S.; Kourelis, J.

2026-01-26 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701577 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pathogen pressure threatens legume crop productivity worldwide. Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors serve as crucial plant resistance genes, recognizing pathogens and triggering immunity. However, the extent and patterns of NLR expression in different tissues and organs, notably across evolutionary time, remain largely uncharacterized. To investigate tissue-specificity of NLR expression in the Fabaceae (legumes), we conducted comparative analyses integrating phylogenomics and transcriptomics in root and shoot tissues across different legume species. The NLR repertoires of 28 legumes were grouped into five monophyletic clades: coiled-coil NLR (CC-NLR), Toll/interleukin-1 receptor NLR (TIR-NLR), G10-subclade CC NLR (CCG10-NLR), RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW 8-like CC NLR (CCR-NLR), and TIR-NB-ARC-like {beta}-propeller WD40/tetratricopeptide repeats (TNPs). Most legume NLRs belonged to CC-NLR and TIR-NLR clades, followed by CCG10-NLR, CCR-NLR, and TNP clades. In seven of these species, comparative analysis of NLR expression in leaves versus roots revealed that over half ([~]57%) of expressed NLR genes showed predominant expression in one tissue: 34% in roots (451/1336), and 23% in leaves (311/1336). We identified 324 root-specific NLRs, 171 leaf-specific NLRs, and 841 non-specific NLRs, with an average tissue specificity per species of 32%. The closely related species grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) and pea (Pisum sativum) were an exception, showing higher levels of leaf-specific rather than root-specific NLR expression. We also identified conserved tissue expression patterns across legume species, resulting in a comprehensive resource describing tissue expression bias, enrichment, and specificity for 113 phylogenetic NLR subclasses. These legume NLR repertoires will support comparative studies between species and inform precision-breeding programs considering tissue expression patterns.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
3
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
13
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
17
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
20
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%