Back

Are interphylum spiralian relationships resolvable?

Serra Silva, A.; Telford, M. J.

2026-01-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701568 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The phyla making up the major animal clade of Spiralia have been clear since the advent of molecular phylogenetics; the relationships between these spiralian phyla have not. The lack of consensus over the relationships between these important animal phyla might be a clue implying their emergence in an explosive radiation. Focusing on the five largest spiralian phyla (Annelida, Brachiopoda, Mollusca, Nemertea and Platyhelminthes) and using two phylogenomic datasets, we have applied site-bootstrapping and taxon-jackknifing to explore this example of taxonomic instability. Analyses on the 105 possible rooted trees relating them showed that interphylum branches are very short. Preference for rooting Spiralia on Platyhelminthes is a long-branch artefact. Most analyses on the 15 unrooted trees showed a preference for the same topology but the support over other solutions was non significant. We conclude that the spiralian phyla emerged in rapid succession resulting in a difficult to resolve radiation. The deep history we infer for Spiralia has wide ranging implications for our interpretation of Cambrian fossils and for the evolution of traits such as biomineralization, segmentation and larvae. Impact StatementAnalyses of two independent phylogenomic datasets suggest an explosive radiation at the origin of Spiralia, with implications for understanding the groups evolutionary history.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.2%
2
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
5
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
14
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
17
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
19
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
22
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
24
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
29
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
30
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%