Back

Clocks and Dominoes: Timing Mechanisms of Embryogenesis

Song, Y.; Leahy, B. D.; Pfister, H.; Ben-Yosef, D.; Needleman, D. J.

2026-01-26 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.01.25.701537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How developmental timings are regulated is a fundamental open question. Two widely considered mechanisms are the clock, in which an internal timer determines when each stage occurs, and the domino, in which the completion of each stage triggers the next. It is often unclear how to establish either mechanism. Here, we construct a quantitative framework that uses the correlation structure of developmental timings to test the clock and domino mechanisms. We apply this framework to human pre-implantation development by using ~1 million images of 2946 embryos acquired during IVF treatment, establishing mathematical models of developmental rate. We find that a domino mechanism governs the cleavage timings, while a pronuclei fade-triggered clock mechanism governs the morula and blastocyst timings. These results are consistent with the cell cycle oscillator governing the cleavage timings and the accumulation of embryonic gene products or the degradation of maternally deposited factors governing the morula and blastocyst timings. We next investigate the physiological regulators of developmental timing by analyzing how the timings are statistically associated with the clinical pregnancy outcome. While embryos that result in a clinical pregnancy tend to exhibit shorter cleavage timings, this association is primarily driven by patient-specific properties. In contrast, embryo-specific properties independently influence the pregnancy outcome and the cleavage timings, so that factors directly determining implantation potential, such as aneuploidy, can only weakly impact the cleavage timings. Taken together, this work provides a robust framework for decoding developmental timing mechanisms, with significant implications for fundamental biology and clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
14
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
15
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%