Back

Chronic acoustic degradation via cochlear implants alters predictive processing of audiovisual speech

Gastaldon, S.; Gheller, F.; Bonfiglio, N.; Brotto, D.; Bottari, D.; Trevisi, P.; Martini, A.; Vespignani, F.; Peressotti, F.

2026-01-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.25.701504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study provides the first neurophysiological evidence of how cochlear implant (CI) input affects predictive processing during audiovisual language comprehension in deaf individuals. Using EEG, we compared 18 CI users with 18 normal-hearing (NH) controls during sentence comprehension where final word predictability was determined by high or low semantic constraint (HC vs. LC) of the preceding sentence frame. Between sentence frame and final word, a 800 ms silent gap was introduced. Mouth visibility was manipulated during sentence frames (visible or digitally occluded; V+ vs. V-), while the final words were always presented with the mouth visible. In NH participants, lower-beta power (12-15 Hz) in left frontal and central sensors decreased for HC vs. LC contexts during the pre-target silent gap, but only when the mouths was visible, suggesting active prediction generation. In CI users, this lower beta power decrease was absent. After final word presentation, both groups showed N400 predictability effects, indicating preserved prediction evaluation. However, CI users exhibited extended N400 effects in the V+ condition, suggesting additional processing demands. Across all participants, pre-target beta modulations correlated with language production abilities, supporting prediction-by-production frameworks. Within CI users, poorer audiometric thresholds correlated with larger N400 constraint effects, possibly indicating greater reliance on contextual prediction to compensate for degraded sensory input. These findings demonstrate that CI-mediated perception alters the neural mechanisms of prediction generation. The link between production skills and predictive mechanisms suggests that strengthening expressive language abilities may enhance predictive processing in CI users.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
16
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
23
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
27
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
30
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%