Residency in the Era of Climate Change: A Multi-Institutional Survey of Medical Student Perceptions and Match Preferences
Walsh, C. J.; Shelby, E.; Quick, C.; Hanneman, K.; Ryu, R. K.; Omary, R. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundClimate change is an escalating health crisis, yet its influence on medical students career decisions remains underexplored. ObjectiveThis study uses the "Six Americas" framework to assess students climate views and the impact on residency and career decisions. MethodsA survey was distributed to students at four North American medical schools from October 2024 to January 2025. The instrument assessed demographic information, climate change views utilizing the Six Americas Super Short Survey, and the impact of climate change on residency and career decisions. Respondents were classified as Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, or Dismissive using the Six Americas framework. Associations between climate attitudes, training year, and intended specialty were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests. ResultsA total of 105 medical students completed the survey. 93% agreed climate change is a major health threat, 66% valued residency program sustainability efforts, and 41% indicated commitment to sustainability influences their rank list. Most students were Alarmed (62%), Concerned (19%), or Cautious (12%). Climate attitudes did not vary by specialty interest. Training year was associated with Six Americas classification (p < 0.05), MS2s had the most Alarmed respondents. ConclusionsMedical students overwhelmingly view climate change as a serious health threat and expect residency programs to demonstrate commitment to sustainability. Nearly half consider environmental values when ranking programs. These findings suggest climate-conscious training environments may gain a competitive recruitment advantage. Given the high proportion of "Alarmed" students, embedding climate-resilient education and sustainable practices into residency programs may align with future physician priorities.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 89%
- Architecture of systems affecting disease trajectories in a conflict zone: A community-centered systems inquiry in North Gaza 88%
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “Climate change and health?”: Knowledge and perceptions among key stakeholders in Puducherry, India 93%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 88%
- Identification of Vulnerable Populations and Areas at Higher Risk of COVID-19 Related Mortality in the U.S. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Influence of Public Health Faculty on College and University Plans during the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 88%
- SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage-related perceptions, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and travel worry among healthcare workers 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.