Back

Who says what when? Patterns in captive common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) volubility

Mircheva, M.; Brügger, R. K.; Burkart, J. M.

2026-01-24 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.01.24.701497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVolubility, the number of vocalizations per unit of time, is a relatively understudied aspect of animal communication, potentially crucial in highly social systems like cooperative breeders that depend on coordinated behavior. Callitrichid monkeys, including common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), are often characterized as highly vocal, yet the variation in their calling rates due to context or individual differences remains poorly quantified. In this study, we systematically examined captive marmoset volubility across different social and informational contexts, call types, and individual characteristics. ResultsWe tested marmosets in dyads in different experimental conditions and recorded a total of 70,260 vocalizations. Overall, calling rates were not influenced by sex or status. Instead, volubility varied mainly with condition: rates increased when visually separated from the partner and individually encountering ecologically salient stimuli such as ambiguous objects or food, consistent with context-sensitive signaling and information asymmetry. Contact calls were more frequent in food-related contexts, indicating a recruiting function. Arousal calls were strongly predicted by age, with younger individuals calling more, especially when confronted with an ambiguous object. Food calls occurred almost exclusively during direct interactions with food, particularly during feeding. Dyadic analyses revealed covariation between callers and partners arousal calls, consistent with vocal contagion. In contrast, we found no contagion effects for food calls. Instead, food calls by a breeder encountering food increased contact calling in their naive dyad partners. ConclusionsOverall, marmoset volubility is flexible and call-type-specific, shows signatures of information sharing under information asymmetry, and highlights their nuanced communication strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
5
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
8
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.1%
10
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
20
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
23
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%