Back

Mismatch type impacts interference and priming activities in the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system

Phan, P. T.; Ozturk, M.; Ravishankar, J.; Dougherty, E. M.; Xue, C.; Sashital, D. G.

2026-01-24 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.01.24.701482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided interference against foreign nucleic acids using the CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided Cascade complex and Cas3 helicase-nuclease. DNA targeting by Cascade-Cas3 promotes priming, a mechanism that allows for rapid acquisition of new spacers within the CRISPR array. Target mutations in the PAM and PAM-proximal seed region can block interference but may still allow priming. Previous studies have suggested that target mutations to T and A are tolerated, but that C and G substitutions are deleterious to interference and priming, respectively. However, the contributions of the crRNA spacer sequence to mutational tolerance remain unclear. Here, we systematically tested the effects of crRNA seed sequences on mutational tolerance. We engineered four E. coli strains with variable spacer sequences and tested CRISPR interference and priming against a plasmid library for each strain. Consistent with prior studies, we observe that mutations to C or G in the seed can be highly deleterious, especially at positions 1, 2 and 4. However, the corresponding crRNA sequence also strongly impacts the level of defect, with rC-dC and rA/G-dG causing the largest defects in our plasmid library experiments. Using in vitro biochemistry, we observe that mismatch type at the first position of the seed affects Cas8 conformation, and results in reduction in the rates of both Cascade-target binding and Cas3 recruitment. Overall, our results reveal that although nucleotide identity of target mutations is an important determinant of type I-E CRISPR immunity, the crRNA sequence also strongly impacts immune outcomes upon target mutation.

Published in Journal of Biological Chemistry (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.