Temporal Phase Differences Encode Tactile Motion from Static Vibrotactile Inputs
Rezaei, E.; Adibi, M.
Show abstract
Motion perception in touch is traditionally attributed to spatially sequential stimulation or skin deformation caused by moving objects. Here, we demonstrate that directional tactile motion can instead be inferred purely from temporal phase differences between two spatially static vibrotactile inputs. Using psychophysical experiments in human participants (n = 54), we show that continuous vibrations delivered to separate fingertips, when offset in phase, evoke a robust and directionally consistent motion percept despite the absence of physical movement. Discrimination performance depended systematically on the temporal phase relationship between stimuli, following a sinusoidal relationship, consistent with a phase-based motion inference mechanism. Vibration amplitude had little influence on perceptual accuracy once stimuli exceeded detection threshold, although higher amplitudes modestly reduced response times. In contrast, envelope dynamics and spatial configuration significantly modulated performance: vibrations with exponential amplitude envelopes - reflecting the natural propagation of mechanical energy through a medium - enhanced phase sensitivity and sped responses, and bimanual stimulation across the two hands improved both accuracy and response time. These findings identify temporal phase integration as a fundamental mechanism for tactile motion perception, analogous to timing-based computations in auditory localisation and visual motion detection. Phase-coded vibrotactile stimulation therefore offers a minimal and efficient strategy for conveying directional motion in haptic interfaces without requiring spatial arrays or moving actuators.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor memories influence movement kinematics but not associated tactile processing 95%
- Tactile Adaptation to Orientation Produces a Robust Tilt Aftereffect and Exhibits Crossmodal Transfer When Tested in Vision 95%
- Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tactile spatial discrimination on the torso using vibrotactile and force stimulation 95%
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 93%
- From static to dynamic: how object rotation influences grasp decisions in ambiguous settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Illusory tactile movement crosses arms and legs and is coded in external space 97%
- Directional biases in whole hand motion perception revealed by mid-air tactile stimulation 96%
- Information processing in the Hand Laterality Judgement Task: Fundamental differences between dorsal and palmar views revealed by a Forced Response paradigm 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.