Structural and Evolutionary Divergence of the RAG1/1L N-Terminal Zinc-Finger Domain
Hong, J.; Liu, Z.; Martin, E.; Wei, K.; Schatz, D. G.; Zhang, Y.
Show abstract
RAG1/2 catalyzes V(D)J recombination to assemble antigen receptor genes, yet the zinc-finger element at the RAG1 N terminus has remained structurally and functionally uncharacterized. Using NMR spectroscopy, we determined the structure of the RAG1 N-terminal zinc-finger domain (NZD; residues 89-223). NZD adopts a compact, zinc-dependent fold comprising four -helices organized into two interdigitated zinc-finger modules, ZFa and ZFb. Structural similarity searches across protein-structure databases revealed no solved homologs, establishing NZD as a previously undescribed zinc-finger fold. Comparative analyses show that NZD is broadly conserved across RAG1 and RAG1-like (RAG1L) proteins but has undergone lineage-specific remodeling, including the jawed vertebrate-specific acquisition of an additional -helix (H2). Guided by structure prediction, we identified two NZD-like types in Chapaev transposases; one is highly similar to the RAG1L NZD, supporting an evolutionary link between RAG1/RAG1L and Chapaev NZDs. Similarity between ZFa and the single-zinc ZAD further suggests that NZD originated from an ancestral single-zinc fold. Together, these findings provide a structural framework for mechanistic and evolutionary analyses of RAG1.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Nucleotide and metalloid-driven conformational changes in the arsenite efflux ATPase ArsA 95%
- Versatile NTP recognition and domain fusions expand the functional repertoire of the ParB-CTPase fold beyond chromosome segregation 95%
- Structural basis of the catalytic and allosteric mechanism of bacterial acetyltransferase PatZ 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.