Early Dementia Diagnosis in Older Adults through Machine Learning: A Cross-Sectional fMRI Data Analysis
Mostafa, F.; Sharma, K.; Khan, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundEarly diagnosis of dementia can significantly improve care planning and patient outcomes while delaying progression. Machine learning algorithms can identify patterns in clinical and neuroimaging data that may aid in the early detection of dementia risk factors. ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of the ensemble machine learning pipeline for classifying dementia status utilizing demographic, clinical, and imaging features, and to identify the most predictive variables contributing to model accuracy. MethodsA cross-sectional study analyzed 373 MRI scans from 150 subjects aged 60-98 years. Variables included cognitive scores (MMSE, CDR), volumetric brain measures (eTIV, nWBV, ASF), demographic features (age, sex, education), and socioeconomic status. After preprocessing and imputing missing values with random forests, tree-based variable selection was performed, and the dataset was split into training and test sets, with 5-fold cross-validation used for model validation. An ensemble of 8 machine learning models was used to classify patients as demented or non-demented. ResultsModel performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Random Forest achieved the highest AUC (0.963), while MLP demonstrated the highest accuracy (94.6%), F1-score (0.943), and MCC (0.893). CDR, MMSE, and ASF were identified as the top predictors. Performance was robust across folds in 5-fold CV, and feature importance analyses supported clinical relevance. ConclusionsEnsemble ML approaches offer high predictive performance in dementia classification. ML frameworks have the potential to be integrated into diagnostic support tools, enabling more accurate and earlier detection of dementia using clinical and imaging data.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable multivariate survival models: Improving predictions for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimers disease (AD) via data fusion and machine learning 97%
- Random forest model for feature-based Alzheimer's disease conversion prediction from early mild cognitive impairment subjects 97%
- Examining heterogeneity in dementia using data-driven unsupervised clustering of cognitive profiles 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alzheimer Disease Knowledge Graph Enhances Knowledge Discovery and Disease Prediction 92%
- Segmentation of the Human Tongue Musculature Using MRI: Field Guide and Validation in Motor Neuron Disease 90%
- Characterizing resting-state EEG oscillatory and aperiodic activity in neurodegenerative diseases: A multicentric study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Explainable Web-Based Diagnostic System for Alzheimer's Disease Using XRAI and Deep Learning on Brain MRI 97%
- ConvNeXt-Driven Detection of Alzheimers Disease: A Benchmark Study on Expert-Annotated AlzaSet MRI Dataset Across Anatomical Planes 96%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease with Low-Cost Neuropsychological Tests: A Novel Predict-Diagnose Approach using Recurrent Neural Networks 97%
- Age-informed, attention-based weakly supervised learning for neuropathological image assessment 95%
- Extending FreeSurfer to estimate sulcal morphology 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 93%
- Phenotyping Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Profiles of Alzheimer's Disease Using Cluster Analysis on EEG Power 93%
- Virtual brain simulations reveal network-specific parameters in neurodegenerative dementias 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.