Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Postoperative Refraction in Cataract Surgery: A Stacking Ensemble Approach
Ipek-Ugay, S.; Zeyadi, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundAchieving precise postoperative refractive outcomes remains a significant challenge in cataract surgery. While advanced intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas exist, they are constrained by their singular algorithmic structures. This study investigated whether a stacking ensemble machine learning approach could overcome these limitations. MethodsA dataset of 1,710 eyes from patients who underwent cataract surgery with monofocal IOL implantation (Vivinex or SA60AT) was utilized. Following rigorous preprocessing and feature engineering, a stacking ensemble architecture was developed comprising three diverse base learners (Multi-Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Regressor with RBF kernel, and SplineTransformer with Linear Regression) and a Ridge Regressor meta-learner. The model was trained on 80% of the data using 5-fold cross-validation and evaluated on an independent 20% test set (n=341). Performance was compared against six standard IOL formulas. ResultsThe stacking ensemble model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, achieving a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.272 D on the independent test set (n=341). The model achieved lower MAE compared to all six standard IOL formulas, including Kane (MAE 0.295 D) and Barrett Universal II (MAE 0.318 D). Clinically, 85.1% of eyes achieved predictions within {+/-}0.50 D, compared to 82.5% for Kane formula and 81.8% for Barrett Universal II. ConclusionThe stacking ensemble machine learning model significantly enhances postoperative refraction prediction accuracy compared to established IOL calculation formulas. By leveraging algorithmic diversity and data-driven learning, this approach represents a promising advancement toward reducing refractive surprises and improving patient satisfaction in cataract surgery. External validation on independent datasets is required to confirm generalizability.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The learning curve of murine subretinal injection among clinically trained ophthalmic surgeons 96%
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 96%
- Current applications of artificial intelligence for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the Nallasamy Formula: A Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Method for Refraction Prediction in Cataract Surgery 98%
- AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas 97%
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Computational Framework for Intraoperative Pupil Analysis in Cataract Surgery 95%
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 94%
- Using electronic health record data to determine the safety of aqueous humor liquid biopsies for molecular analyses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 96%
- Factors predicting the visual outcome of intracorneal ring segment for keratoconus 95%
- Automated 360-degree goniophotography with the NIDEK Gonioscope GS-1 for glaucoma 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.