Back

Using bobcat (Lynx rufus) movement patterns to inform strategies for road mitigation

Mercer, M. M.; Mollohan, C. M.; Baldwin, K.; LeCount, A.; Noonan, M. J.; Alston, J. M.

2026-01-25 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.01.23.701409 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEven for wildlife species that often persist in urban and suburban areas, vehicle collisions remain a common source of mortality, and roads can fragment and degrade habitat. Quantifying animal behavior near roads can help wildlife managers develop management strategies to reduce mortality from vehicles while maintaining connectivity. C_LIO_LITo determine how roads affect movement of bobcats (Lynx rufus)--a common mesopredator in urban and suburban areas of North America--we analyzed GPS tracking data from bobcats using continuous-time movement analyses. Our study focused on three questions regarding bobcat movement near roads: (1) Are roads barriers to bobcat movement? (2) How often do bobcats use wildlife crossing structures to cross roads? (3) How does bobcat movement behavior change when bobcats are closer to roads? C_LIO_LIWe found that bobcats crossed roads 11% less frequently than expected from random chance, and this effect was largely driven by interstates and major local roads. We found little evidence that bobcats selectively used culverts or underpasses to cross roads, or that bobcat movement behavior (i.e., speed or home range size) varied with road density, although daily distance traveled increased with road density. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Managers attempting to reduce bobcat mortality from vehicle collisions must do more than simply building wildlife crossing structures. Fences to funnel bobcats toward crossing structures, rumble strips to scare bobcats from roads, reduced speed limits, and wildlife warning signs for drivers may be more effective tools for reducing bobcat-vehicle collisions. This study also provides a rigorous framework for considering the implications of movement behavior for lack of connectivity and mortality as distinct but not mutually exclusive threats posed by roads for wildlife. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
2
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
9
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
21
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
24
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
25
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
27
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%