Back

A New Cost Effective, Simplified Workflow for Transposon Insertion Sequencing (TIS)

Hill, C. L.; Baker, D. J.; Wain, J. R.

2026-01-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.23.699905 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transposon insertion sequencing (TIS) encompasses methods such as Transposon Directed Insertion sequencing (TraDIS) and Transposon-Sequencing (Tn-Seq); these methods are widely uses for genome scale screens of essential and conditionally essential genes. Early limitations centred on mutant generation, today the biggest factor is sequencing and data generation and the costs associated. Here, we present and evaluate four methods TIS sequencing library generation protocols compatible with Illumina whole genome sequencing (WGS) workflows to maximise sequence efficiency and minimise turnaround times and costs. Using E.coli BW25113 transposon mutagenesis libraries generated with Tn5 and mariner (Himar1) transposons, we compare the methods in terms of reagent cost, workflow complexity, and target enrichments for the recovery of unique insertion sites and essential genes identified. All methods generated TIS data suitable for gene essentiality analysis. Illumina Flex based protocols were 4-6 tomes cheaper than the traditional Illumina Nextera based approach with similar or superior Transposon-Chromosome (Tn-Chr) junction enrichment. Across all methods, sequencing depth and mutant library density were the dominant factor in useful biological insight. Subsampling demonstrated that for a good quality mutant library, five million reads were sufficient to identify essential genes in E.coli. Whereas deeper sequencing reduced the statistical power and included contaminating background noise, seen primarily with Tn5. We conclude that an Illumina Flex based approach, especially when integrating with routine WGS, provides an excellent balance of speed, cost and data quality. Assuming five million reads and a robust Illumina Flex approach, a TIS library can be sequenced for around {pound}40.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
7
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
24
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%