Evaluating the Scale Functioning of The Health System Literacy Scale in Canada (HSL-CAN): A Partial Credit Model
Vo, A. T.; Cao, Y.; Yang, L.; Urquhart, R.; Yi, Y.; Wang, P. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundAdapted from the Navigational Health Literacy scale (HLS19 - NAV-HL), the 20-item Health System Literacy (HSL-CAN) was developed to measure health system literacy among Chinese Canadians. However, little is known about the functioning of its response categories. MethodThis study aimed to evaluate the proper functioning of the response categories using data from 681 adult Chinese Canadians aged 30 years or older who have resided in Canada for at least six months. Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey. The partial credit model was utilized to evaluate the dimensionality of the scale, item- and category-level fit statistics, and the ordering of category thresholds. ResultsFindings supported the unidimensional construct of the scale. Most items met the item theory response (IRT) model requirements, demonstrating acceptable item fit statistics, except for three items with outfit-t statistics outside the acceptable range. Adjacent response category thresholds were increased monotonically, and threshold distances were within the recommended upper range, although relatively narrow distances were observed for several items. Person separation reliability and person separation index indicated good internal consistency and adequate discrimination among individuals with different level of health system literacy. ConclusionThis study provides evidence supporting the unidimensional construct and a proper functioning of the 5-point Likert response scale, suggesting that the HSL-CAN is a psychometrically appropriate instrument for evaluating health system literacy among Chinese Canadians. Future studies are needed to examine the scales applications across more diverse populations in Canada.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 96%
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 96%
- Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 93%
- Determinants of Periodic Health Examination Uptake: Insights from a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Study 93%
- Impact on Mental Health of students due to restriction caused by COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, perception, and attitude toward premarital screening among university students in Kurdistan region- Iraq 93%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 93%
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 93%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical overuse in the Iranian healthcare system: a systematic scoping review and practical recommendations for decreasing medical overuse during unexpected COVID-19 pandemic opportunity 91%
- Stakeholder Perspectives on the Adaptability of Hospital Drug Formularies to Disease Patterns: A Modified Q-Methodology Study in Vietnam 90%
- Increased levels of anxiety among medical and non-medical university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.