A survey approach to assess the work and learning environment and stimulate informed change within the individual departments of an academic health center
Varkey, S. A.; Thomas, E. N.; Layton, R. L.; Freeman, A. M.; Sompalli, S.; Manasseh, R.; King, M.; Branch, M. D.; Brown, S. H.; Pathman, D. E.
Show abstract
Creating a psychologically safe and supportive environment is important for everyone who works and learns within an academic health center (AHC) as well as important to AHC overall success. Recognizing a need to better understand the strengths and areas for improvement in an AHCs environment, we developed and fielded an environment survey tailored to our many student, resident, postdoctoral researcher, staff, and faculty constituencies. This paper outlines the methodological and practical considerations and outcomes in developing and deploying the survey, including information on how it was received and the activities it subsequently stimulated. Three elements were central to our efforts: (a) analyzing and reporting findings at the individual department, center, and learner group level, where individuals directly experience the environment day-to-day, (b) characterizing the environment through three core dimensions of peoples experiences, which were perceiving that the department strives to be supportive; feeling embraced, appreciated, and supported within the environment; and feeling accepted in ones beliefs, and (c) prioritizing the dissemination of findings to all members of the community. We provide our questionnaire and outline the findings report design, a document received favorably by departments and their leaders. All of these documents can be adapted by other AHCs aiming to assess their environments, learn where to target interventions, while also monitoring progress.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 95%
- Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices 95%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 95%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 93%
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 94%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 94%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 93%
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 94%
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.