Back

Prognostic Risk Refinement using Artificial Intelligence in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer: Implications for CDK4/6 Eligibility Criteria

McAndrew, N. P.; Ma, C.; Davis, A. A.; Chiru, E. D.; Bardia, A.; Abdelsattar, J. M.; Cappadona, J.; Zeng, K.; Geras, K. J.; Witowski, J.; Tang, C.

2026-01-25 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.23.26344621 medRxiv
Show abstract

Patient selection and enrolment into phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapies depend on accurate risk definition. However, standard clinicopathologic criteria incompletely capture recurrence risk, limiting their efficacy in treatment selection. To assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced prognostication may enrich the clinical risk groups utilized in the adjuvant NATALEE trial, we evaluated Ataraxis Breast RISK (ATX), a multimodal AI test that integrates clinical data with morphological features from H&E-stained slides. ATX risk scores were generated for 2,228 patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, of which 918 (41%) were classified as clinical high-risk and 1,310 (59%) were clinical low-risk. ATX was significantly associated with recurrence-free interval in both clinical risk groups and identified high-risk patients not captured by current clinical criteria, as well as individuals with limited benefit despite clinical high-risk classification. Consequently, integration of AI-enhanced risk assessment may improve selection of patients likely to benefit from adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors relative to current criteria.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.