Prognostic Risk Refinement using Artificial Intelligence in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer: Implications for CDK4/6 Eligibility Criteria
McAndrew, N. P.; Ma, C.; Davis, A. A.; Chiru, E. D.; Bardia, A.; Abdelsattar, J. M.; Cappadona, J.; Zeng, K.; Geras, K. J.; Witowski, J.; Tang, C.
Show abstract
Patient selection and enrolment into phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapies depend on accurate risk definition. However, standard clinicopathologic criteria incompletely capture recurrence risk, limiting their efficacy in treatment selection. To assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced prognostication may enrich the clinical risk groups utilized in the adjuvant NATALEE trial, we evaluated Ataraxis Breast RISK (ATX), a multimodal AI test that integrates clinical data with morphological features from H&E-stained slides. ATX risk scores were generated for 2,228 patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, of which 918 (41%) were classified as clinical high-risk and 1,310 (59%) were clinical low-risk. ATX was significantly associated with recurrence-free interval in both clinical risk groups and identified high-risk patients not captured by current clinical criteria, as well as individuals with limited benefit despite clinical high-risk classification. Consequently, integration of AI-enhanced risk assessment may improve selection of patients likely to benefit from adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors relative to current criteria.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 96%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 95%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a gene expression score to account for tumour purity and improve prognostication in breast cancer 94%
- Explainable, federated deep learning model predicts disease progression risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 93%
- Predicting the Tumor Microenvironment Composition and Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Digital Histopathology Images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 96%
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 96%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and prognostic validation of a three-level NHG-like deep learning-based model for histological grading of breast cancer 96%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 94%
- Acquired mutations and transcriptional remodeling in long-term estrogen-deprived locoregional breast cancer recurrences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.