Back

Corncob Bedding Negatively Impacts Breeding Performance and Sexual Development in Mice

Lujan, V.; Ratuski, A. S.; Byrd, K. A.; Coden, K. M.; Bentzel, D. E.; Garner, J. P.

2026-01-24 physiology
10.64898/2026.01.22.701214 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Corncob bedding is commonly used for housing rodents in research, but previous work has linked corncob to altered reproductive behavior, disrupted estrous cycling, aggression, and welfare impacts across non-murine rodents. Furthermore, corncob is used as a licensed commercial rodenticide. Corncob contains endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) that interfere with aromatase activity and estrogen signaling, processes critical for normal sexual behavior and development, yet effects on reproductive outcomes in mice remain unexplored. We conducted two experiments to test whether corncob bedding influences breeding performance and male sexual development. In Experiment 1, we analyzed breeding records to compare breeding performance of NSG mice housed on corncob versus cellulose bedding across two 3-month phases (N = 488 litters). Pairs housed on corncob produced significantly fewer pups than pairs housed on cellulose. To understand this effect, in Experiment 2, hormonal and morphological effects of corncob were assessed in male mice from four genetic backgrounds (C57BL/6, BALB/c, FVB, and CD1; N = 32 cages). Mice were bred and born on aspen or corncob, with half switched at weaning and half unchanged. Corncob produced timing-dependent effects in male reproductive physiology and development. Early-life corncob exposure altered baculum morphology and reduced testosterone, estradiol, and anogenital distance. In contrast, post-weaning corncob exposure resulted in hyper-masculinization, indicated by increased anogenital distance. Alongside prior evidence that corncob contains EDCs, our results raise serious concerns about its suitability as bedding in animal research. Continued use of corncob introduces uncontrolled variation that compromises animal welfare, reproduction, experimental validity, and reproducibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
4
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
10
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
16
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
18
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%