Back

The SynMuvA lin-15A licenses natural transdifferentiation by antagonizing identity safeguarding mechanisms

Becker, S.; Morin, M. C.; Lambert, J.; Suman, S. K.; Carelli, F.; Appert, A.; Roth, S.; Hoff-Yoessle, S.; Medina Sanchez, J.; Portoso, M.; Le Gras, S.; Ahringer, J.; JARRIAULT, S.

2026-01-23 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.01.22.701184 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanisms that restrict or enable latent cellular plasticity have attracted growing interest over the past decade, with important implications for cancer and regenerative therapies. However, the diversity of both pro- and anti-plasticity mechanisms remains incompletely understood. Here, we identify the THAP domain gene lin-15A as a novel factor involved in the natural rectal-to-neuronal Y-to-PDA transdifferentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. We found that, unlike previously described essential factors, lin-15A is not a Driver of transdifferentiation. Instead, it antagonizes several chromatin-modifying complexes known to safeguard differentiated cell identities. We also show that lin-15A is not a core plasticity factor per se but acts as one specifically in the Y cell context. Together, our findings support a model in which diverse molecular players coordinate controlled cell identity conversions: plasticity factors function as Drivers, while others like lin-15A which we propose to term Licensers attenuate identity safeguarding mechanisms, thereby facilitating transdifferentiation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 3%
18.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Genes & Development
● 90 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
GENETICS
◐ 483 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
EMBO Reports
○ 263 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
9
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
12
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
◐ 252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Journal of Cell Science
● 393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.1%
16
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
17
Developmental Biology
○ 150 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
◐ 351 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
○ 233 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.