Back

Distinct trajectories of urbanization shape the human gut microbiome across South Asia

Ramachandran, S. L.; Pasupuleti, N.; Abdill, R. J.; Adikari, G.; Ahlawat, B.; Blekhman, R.; Burgo, V.; Davenport, E. R.; Dwivedi, A.; Gupta, S.; Ijinu, T. P.; Jamir, T.; Karu, R.; Kaushik, A.; Komarabathini, J. M.; Laithangpuii, ; Lalzarliana, J.; Norbu, T.; Pautu, T.; Pawar, K.; Raman, A. S.; Ramaswamy, R.; Ranasinghe, R.; Rashmi, ; Sasidharan, S. P.; Satheesh, T.; Shaji, S.; Shapiro, J. W.; Singh, E.; Singson, V.; Sundararajan, A.; Tennekoon, K. H.; Tetso, D.; Urban Aragon, J. A.; Welikala, A. H. J.; Yhome, R. R.; Rai, N.; Raghavan, M.

2026-01-23 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.22.701183 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human gut microbiomes respond to lifestyle transitions, yet the extent to which these responses are conserved across spatio-cultural contexts remains undercharacterized. We present the South Asian MicroBiome ARray (SAMBAR), a population-scale 16S gut microbiome study of 575 adults from ten geographically and socio-culturally diverse South Asian communities. Each community was sampled in ancestral villages and urban centers, enabling controlled comparisons of geography and lifestyle. Relative to global cohorts, SAMBAR microbiomes occupy a distinct compositional space with stronger correlation to geography and community membership than lifestyle. Although urbanization is consistently associated with increased abundance of disease-linked taxa, microbiome responses to lifestyle transitions are largely community-driven, including the acquisition of wheat- and dairying-associated microbial modules in some communities that may facilitate non-genetic adaptation to lactase non-persistence. Microbiome responses to urbanization are heterogeneous even at regional scales, reflecting local culture and geography and underscoring the need for community-specific investigations of health impacts.

Published in Gut Microbes (predicted rank #18) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.