Back

TRACE: Open-Source Software for Quantifying Somatic Variation of Tandem Repeats by Capillary Electrophoresis

Jiang, A.; Correia, K.; Gillis, T.; Oliver, E. L.; Jones, B. P.; McAllister, B.; Mejia Maza, A.; MacDonald, M. E.; Mouro Pinto, R.; Wheeler, V.; Gusella, J.; McLean, Z. L.

2026-01-23 genetics
10.64898/2026.01.22.701167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Expanded short tandem DNA repeats are implicated in over 60 human disorders. In many, somatic instability (SI) of the repeat plays a critical role in disease pathogenesis. For example, SI in vulnerable neurons is a key driver of clinical symptoms in Huntingtons disease. Quantifying SI has traditionally relied on PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis, with metrics describing the shape of repeat size distributions, such as the expansion index. However, current tools often require costly proprietary software, are time-consuming, and rely on custom pipelines that vary between labs. To address these challenges, we developed Tandem Repeats Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis (TRACE), an open-source software that processes fragment analysis data end-to-end, from raw files to SI metrics. Additionally, we created an associated web app TRACE-shiny (https://traceshiny.mgh.harvard.edu/), for interactive usage. Outputs from TRACE benchmarked against published datasets confirm its utility for studying genetic and pharmacological modifiers of SI. TRACE eliminates the need for proprietary software or custom pipelines, making advanced tools for analysis of somatic repeat expansion widely accessible.

Published in Journal of Huntington's Disease · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
28.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
◐ 252 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
7
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
8
STAR Protocols
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
10
The American Journal of Human Genetics
○ 234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Human Mutation
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
GENETICS
◐ 483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Current Protocols
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
23
Disease Models & Mechanisms
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Molecular Ecology Resources
○ 171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
29
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.